Accessibility
Adjust the site to suit you. Your choices are kept on this device.
Ηπειρώτικα · Epirotic Greek
RESEARCH NOTE
Epirus; local traditions need individual classification and locality evidence.
RESEARCH NOTE
Separate eastern/western local evidence; no uniform Epirotic branch
| Hatzidakis (1892) B01 p.342 | Mentioned The northern or southern assignment has not yet been entered. Eastern and western Epirus evidence must stay separate. |
|---|---|
| VLACH (ÖAW) (n.d.) B05 north/south distribution | Mentioned VLACH distinguishes eastern and western Epirus. |
RF-EPI-01 · Phonetics
Dimos reports gradient, speaker-variable assimilation in a small interview sample. B36 §2.1 p.60; §3 pp.61–62; §4 p.63
LIMIT UoI programme; 2008 interviews; about 250 tokens / seven speakers. Exact settlements unspecified; institutional provenance alone does not identify shared recordings.
Passage inspected Withheld, under review
RF-EPI-02 · Geographic classification
Dimos adopts Hatzidakis 1892 Northern classification; broad labels must retain their dependency and be compared with source-defined regional scopes. B36 B36 p.59 adopts Hatzidakis 1892; B01 pp.342–343; B05 distribution overview B01 B36 p.59 adopts Hatzidakis 1892; B01 pp.342–343; B05 distribution overview B05 B36 p.59 adopts Hatzidakis 1892; B01 pp.342–343; B05 distribution overview
LIMIT B36 classification agreement is not independent corroboration of B01; no uniform Epirus branch or token-locality assignment inferred.
Passage inspected Withheld, under review
RF-EPI-03 · Archive lead
The archive page identifies an Eleousa locality-labelled entry. B37 Locality and course/year metadata
LIMIT Audio not inspected; archive description does not corroborate acoustic results.
Metadata only Withheld, under review
Eight research workstreams. Coverage shows what has been examined, not how important a community is.